|
|
The History and Philosophy of Islamic Science
See also: Classification of Knowledge in Islam - A Study in Islamic Philosophies of Science by Osman Bakar |
The essays presented in The History and Philosophy of Islamic Science discuss the principles behind the different sciences cultivated in the Islamic world from the third century of the Islamic era onwards and the place of science in relation to other branches of Islamic learning. In defining what Islamic science means, Professor Osman Bakar shows how these sciences are organically related to the fundamental teachings of Islam. Covering all the natural and mathematical sciences, The History and Philosophy of Islamic Science illustrates what Islamic science shares with modern science. Professor Osman Bakar also highlights where the Islamic approach to science differs from the secular, modern approach.
Professor Dato’ Dr Osman Bakar is Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic Affairs) of the University of Malaya, Malaysia and an authority on Islamic science. He is the author of Classification of Knowledge in Islam.
‘[Osman Bakar’s book] marks a most valuable contribution both to the effort of revealing the Islamic intellectual and spiritual approach to science, and to the concomitant endeavour to highlight the deeper causes of the contemporary crisis in western science and technology...it opens up, with clarity and simplicity, the philosophy of Islamic science.’
Islamic QuarterlySee also:
Classification
of Knowledge in Islam
- A Study
in Islamic Philosophies of Science
by
Osman
Bakar
[Return to Catalogue] [Fons Vitae books] [Sufism] [Secure book orders]
Excerpt from 'The History and
Philosophy of Islamic Science':
Tawhid: The Source of Scientific Spirit
Muslim religious consciousness is essentially the consciousness of the Unity of
God. The scientific spirit is not opposed to this religious consciousness, since
it is an integral part of the latter. To possess a consciousness of Divine Unity
is to affirm the truth that God is One in His Essence, in His Attributes and
Qualities, and in His Works. One important consequence of affirming this central
truth is that one has to accept the objective reality of cosmic unity. As a
source of knowledge, religion is emphatic in maintaining that all things in the
universe are interrelated in a web of cosmic unity through the cosmic laws
governing them. The cosmos is made up of many levels of reality, not just the
physical. But it constitutes a unity because it must manifest the oneness of its
metaphysical source and origin religiously called God. In fact, the Quran
strongly argues that cosmic unity is a clear proof of Divine Unity.
The scientific spirit of Muslim scientists and scholars flows, in fact, from
their consciousness of tawhid. There is no doubt that, religiously and
historically speaking, the origin and development of the scientific spirit in
Islam differs from that in the West. Nothing better illustrates the religious
origin of the scientific spirit in Islam than the fact that this spirit was
first demonstrated in the religious sciences.
Muslims did not begin to cultivate the natural sciences in earnest until the
third century of the Islamic era (the ninth century of the common era). But when
they did so they were already in possession of a scientific attitude and a
scientific frame of mind, which they had inherited from the religious sciences.
The passion for truth and objectivity, the general respect for fully
corroborated empirical evidence, and a mind skilled in the classification of
things were some of the most outstanding features of early Muslim religious
scholarship as can clearly be seen in their studies of jurisprudence and the
prophetic traditions.
A love for definitions and conceptual or semantic analysis with great emphasis
on logical clarity and precision was also very much evident in Muslim legal
thought as well as in the sciences related to the study of various aspects of
the Quran such as in the science of Quranic commentaries (ilm al-tafsir). In
Islam, logic was never conceived as being opposed to religious faith. Even the
grammarians, who initially opposed the introduction of Aristotelian logic (mantiq)
by philosophers like al-Farabi, did so on the belief that their Stoic-like
juridical-theological logic, known as adab al-jadal (art of argumentation), was
already sufficient to meet their logical needs.
Among Muslim philosophers and scientists, logic was always viewed as an
indispensable tool of scientific thinking. They also considered logic a form of
hikmah (wisdom), a form of knowledge which is extolled by the Quran. In their
use of logic, they were as much concerned with clarity and consistency as with
truth and certitude. They were too aware of the fact that logic is a
double-edged instrument which can serve both truth and error.
Logic was developed by Muslim philosophers and scientists within the framework
of a religious consciousness of the Transcendent. In their view, logic, when
used correctly and by an intellect that is not corrupted by the lower passions,
may lead one to the Transcendent itself.’ An obvious function of logic in
relation to religious truths is to help explain their rationality and clarify
their overall consistency in the face of outward appearances of incoherence and
contradiction.
Some philosopher-scientists, such as al-Farabi, wrote works which sought to
demonstrate that Aristotelian logic found strong scriptural support in the Quran
and the prophetic hadiths. When a religious scholar of the stature of
al-Ghazzali wrote a work with a similar purpose, and with full conviction
embraced Aristotelian logic in its entirety, the last significant traces of
opposition to that logic from the religious quarters disappeared. Mantiq in its
Islamic home became an important tool not only of the philosophical sciences but
also of the religious sciences.
It is indeed significant that al-burhan, the term used in Muslim logic to denote
the scientific method of demonstration or demonstrative proof, is derived from
one of the names of the Quran. According to al-Ghazzali, the Quranic term
al-mizan, usually translated as the balance, refers among other things to logic.
Logic is the balance with which man weighs ideas and opinions to arrive at the
correct measurement or judgment.
Table of Contents
| Part One:The Epistemological Foundation of Islamic Science | |
| 1. | Religious Consciousness and the Scientific Spirit in Islamic Tradition |
| 2. | The Question of Methodology in Islamic Science |
| 3. | The Place of Doubt in Islamic Epistemology: al-Ghazzali’s Philosophical Experience |
| Part Two: Man, Nature, and God in Islamic Science | |
| 4. | The Unity of Science and Spiritual Knowledge: The Islamic Experience |
| 5. | The Atomistic Conception of Nature in Ash’arite Theology |
| 6. | An Introduction to the Philosophy of Islamic Medicine |
| Part Three: Islamic Science and the West | |
| 7. | The Influence of Islamic Science on Medieval Christian Conceptions of Nature |
| 8. | Umar Khayyam’s Criticism of Euclid’s Theory of Parallels |
| Part Four: Islam and Modern Science | |
| 9. | Islam and Bioethics |
| 10. | Muslim Intellectual Responses to Modern Science |
| 11. | Islam, Science and Technology: Past Glory, Present Predicaments, and the Shaping of the Future |
| Appendix: Designing a Sound Syllabus for Courses on Philosophy of Applied and Engineering Sciences in a 21st Century Islamic University | |
[Return to Catalogue] [Fons Vitae books] [Sufism] [Secure book orders]