![]() |
Science and Civilization in Islam The Islamic Texts Society (1987) ISBN 094662111X Hardback and Paperback same price; Index/Bibliography 388 pp. 216x134 Price: $27.99
|
Science and Civilization in Islam has remained unsurpassed as the authoritative statement on this subject. With his characteristic breadth of learning, clarity of exposition and insight, Seyyed Hossein Nasr presents here for the first time a full picture of Islamic science, not as a chapter in the history of Western science, but as an integral aspect of Islamic civilisation and the Islamic intellectual tradition. By means of an historical presentation, an analysis of its forms, including the use of passages from the writings of many Muslim scientists and philosophers, the author is able to convey not only a sense of the operative context of Islamic science but he also demonstrates its inter-relatedness with the sapiential wisdom on which it is based. An introductory chapter provides the reader with a necessary orientation to the subject according to the principles of Islam, while subsequent chapters survey the whole spectrum of the individual sciences from cosmology, philosophy, theology to alchemy, physics, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine concluding with a chapter on the gnostic tradition. For this edition, Dr Nasr has written a preface surveying the fields covered in the book since its first appearance in 1968, and has provided a supplement that brings the Bibliography up to date.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr was born in Teheran to a family of traditional scholars and physicians. After receiving his early education in Iran he went to America where he studied physics , and the history of science and philosophy at M.I.T. and Harvard, where he received his doctorate. Nasr was Professor at Teheran University and founder and first President of the Iranian Academy of Philosophy. He is currently Professor of Islamic Studies at George Washington University and author of numerous books including: Islam and the Plight of Modern Man, A Young Muslim’s Guide to the Modern World and Ideals and Realities of Islam, all published by The Islamic Texts Society.
By means of an historical presentation, an analysis of its forms, including the use of passages from the writings of many Muslim scientists and philosophers, the author is able to convey not only a sense of the operative context of Islamic science, but he also demonstrates its interrelatedness with the sapiential wisdom on which it is based. Section headings include:
The Universal Figures of Islamic Science; The Basis of the Teaching System and the Educational Institutions; Cosmology, Cosmography, Geography, and Natural History; Physics; Mathematics; Astronomy; Medicine; The Sciences of Man; The Alchemical Tradition; Islamic Alchemy and its Influence in the Western World; Philosophy; The Controversies of Philosophy and Theology; and The Gnostic Tradition.
[Return to Catalogue] [Fons Vitae books] [Sufism] [Secure book orders]

Excerpt: The Basis of the Teaching
System and the Educational Institutions
A. The Classifications of the Sciences
The Islamic classification of the sciences is based upon a hierarchy which has
over the centuries formed the matrix and background of the Muslim educational
system. The unity of the sciences has throughout been the first and most central
intuition, in the light of which the different sciences have been studied.
Starting from this unarguable intuition of the unity of various disciplines, the
sciences have come to be regarded as so many branches of a single tree, which
grows and sends forth leaves and fruit in conformity with the nature of the tree
itself. Just as a branch of a tree does not continue to grow indefinitely, so
any discipline is not to be pursued beyond a certain limit. The medieval Muslim
authors regarded the pursuit of any particular branch of knowledge beyond its
limits—thereby destroying the harmony and the proportion of things—as a useless,
one might even say illegitimate activity, such as would be true of a branch of a
tree which, by continuing to grow indefinitely, would end by destroying the
harmony of the tree as a whole. The means whereby the proportion and hierarchy
of the sciences were preserved was through their classification to which Muslim
scholars devoted so much attention: In this manner the scope and position of
each science within the total scheme of knowledge was always kept in view.
1. AL-FARABI AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SCIENCES
Among Muslim scholars, attempts to classify the sciences began as early as the
third/ninth century with al-Kindi, and multiplied thereafter. At first based on
the Aristotelian division of the sciences into theoretical, practical, and
productive, as described in Porphyry’s Isagoge, these systems of classification
became progressively more elaborate. Islamic disciplines were added to the
ancient sciences, and religious and metaphysical knowledge in the sense of
gnosis came to occupy the highest levels.
One of the earliest and most influential classifications was that of al-Farabi,
contained in his Enumeration of the Sciences (ihsa al-ulum) known in the West as
De Scientiis, from the Latin translation by Gerard of Cremona, as well as in a
Hebrew translation. Although partly eclipsed by his successor Avicenna, al-Farabi
left his imprint upon most of the Muslim thinkers who followed him, as can be
seen from the fact that his classification of the sciences was adopted, with
only minor changes, by Avicenna, al-Ghazali, and Averroes.
Curiously enough, although al-Farabi himself wrote treatises on alchemy, the
interpretation of dreams, and other esoteric sciences, he did not include them
in his classification. In this respect, he was followed by the more
rationalistic philosophers of the later centuries.
His classification, according to the Enumeration of the Sciences, may be
summarized as follows:
I. Science of language: syntax, grammar, pronunciation and speech, poetry
II. Logic: the division, definition and composition of simple ideas
[corresponding to the content of the Isagoge of Porphyry, and the Categories and
On Interpretation of Aristotle.] The parts of logic after the terms have been
defined are five:
1. Necessary conditions for premises which would lead in a syllogism to certain
knowledge [corresponding to the Posterior Analytics of Aristotle].
2. Definition of useful syllogisms and the means of discovering dialectical
proofs [corresponding to the Topics of Aristotle].
3. Examination of errors in proofs, and of omissions and mistakes committed in
reasoning, and the ways of escaping them [corresponding to the On Sophistic
Refutations of Aristotle].
4. Definition of oratory: syllogism used to bring a discussion before the public
[corresponding to Aristotle’s Rhetoric].
5. Study of poetry; how it should be adapted to each subject; its faults and
imperfections [corresponding to Aristotle’s Poetics]
III. The propaedeutic sciences:
1. Arithmetic (practical, theoretical).
2. Geometry (practical, theoretical).
3. Optics.
4. Science of the heavens (astrology, motions and figures of the heavenly
bodies).
5. Music (practical, theoretical).
6. Science of weights.
7. Science of tool-making (the making of simple ma chines and instruments for
use in various arts sciences, such as astronomy and and music).
IV. Physics (sciences of nature)
Metaphysics (science concerned with the Divine and the principles of things)
Physics:
1. Knowledge of the principles which underlie natural bodies.
2. Knowledge of the nature and character of the elements, and of the principle
by which they combine to form bodies.
3. Science of the generation and corruption of bodies.
4. Science of the reactions which the elements undergo in order to form
compounds.
5. Science of compound bodies formed of the four elements and their properties.
6. Science of minerals.
7. Science of plants.
8. Science of animals.
Metaphysics:
1. Knowledge of the essence of beings.
2. Knowledge of the principles of the particular and observational sciences (the
“first philosophy” of Aristotle).
3. Knowledge of non-corporeal beings, their qualities and characteristics,
leading finally to the knowledge of the Truth, that is, of God, one of whose
names is the Truth.
V. Science of Society:
1. Jurisprudence.
2. Rhetoric.
2. IBN KHALDUN AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SCIENCES
Early attempts to classify the sciences were followed with some modification and
elaboration during the next century by Avicenna in The Book of Healing and his
Treatise on the Classification of the Intellectual Sciences, as well as by the
Brethren of Purity in their well-known Epistles. Moreover, the tradition of
composing works on the classification of the sciences and the description of
each science gradually became further enhanced, as the various sciences became
more developed. This can be seen in The Book of Sixty Sciences by the
sixth/twelfth-century theologian, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi in which, as the name
indicates, sixty sciences are mentioned and described. The most complete and
detailed study of the sciences and their classification, however, appears in the
writings of the authors of the eighth/ fourteenth to the eleventh/ seventeenth
century, such as the Happiness of Tashkubrazadah; the neglected Persian
encyclopedia of Shams al-Din al-Amuli, called Precious Elements of the Sciences;
he Clarification of Doubts of Hajji Khalifah, and the well-known Introduction to
History (Muqaddimah) of Ibn Khaldun, which contains one of the best descriptions
and classifications of the Muslim sciences.
Coming at the end of the most active period of Islamic history, Ibn Khaldun’s
analysis of the sciences represents the results of the reflection upon and acute
observation of, a whole epoch of history by a profound Muslim scholar and
historian who, in a sense, stood outside it.
In his Introduction to History, Ibn Khaldun also surveys the arts and sciences
of the Islamic world, defining the aim and scope of each discipline. Although
his Introduction was not itself universally read during the later periods, his
classification contains in summary in summary fashion the plan according to
which the arts and sciences have, in fact, been studied in most religious
Islamic schools during the past several centuries. Even if many of these
schools, especially in the Sunni world, have not studied all the subjects
enumerated by Ibn Khaldun, they have usually accepted the principles of his
classification, which can be considered the final version of the Islamic
division of the sciences. Ibn Khaldun’s division may be summarized as follows:
Sciences studied in the Islamic world: philosophical and intellectual (such as
can be learned by man naturally through the use of his innate reason and
intelligence); transmitted (such as can be learned only by transmission, going
back ultimately to the founder of the science and in the case of religious
sciences to the origin of the Revelation).
Philosophical or Intellectual Sciences:
1. Logic.
2. Natural sciences or Physics: Medicine, Agriculture.
3. Sciences of beings beyond Nature, or Metaphysics: Science of the occult
properties of letters of the alphabet; alchemy.
4. Sciences dealing with quantity: Geometry (plain and spherical optics);
Arithmetics (property of numbers, art of calculation, algebra, commercial
transactions, calculations of inheritance); Music; Astronomy (the making of
astronomical tables, motion of heavenly bodies, astrology).
transmitted sciences:
1. Quran, its interpretation and recitation.
2. Hadith, the sayings of the Prophets and their chain of transmission.
3. Jurisprudence, sacred law.
4. Theology.
5. Sufism (al-tasawwuf).
6. Linguistic sciences, such as Grammar, Lexicography, and Literature.
Not all of the sciences enumerated above have always been taught in all of the
institutions of learning which have constituted the most formal and official
educational organizations in the Islamic world. But they have been transmitted
from one generation to another through either formal instruction or private
teaching, and they must therefore be regarded as a part of the intellectual life
of Islam. It is, needless to say, impossible to give examples of all of these
sciences in this book even if we were to confine ourselves to those sciences
which deal with the realm of Nature. We can do no more than describing briefly
learning which the institutions of learning which have been for the most part
responsible for keeping alive the tradition of learning over the centuries, and
to present a sample from the writing’s of some of the more important scientific
and philosophical schools, so as to form from the bits thus assembled a mosaic
which may give some indication of the rich and varied intellectual life of the
Islamic world.
Science & Civilization in Islam
| 1. | The Universal Figures of Islamic Science. |
| 2. | The Basis of the Teaching System and the Educational Institutions. |
| 3. | Cosmology, Cosmography, Geography, and Natural History. |
| 4. | Physics. |
| 5. | Mathematics. |
| 6. | Astronomy. |
| 7. | Medicine. |
| 8. | The Sciences of Man. |
| 9. | The Alchemical Tradition. |
| 10. | Islamic Alchemy and its Influence in the Western World. |
| 11. | Philosophy. |
| 12. | The Controversies of Philosophy and Theology. |
| 13. | The Gnostic Tradition. |
[Return to Catalogue] [Fons Vitae books] [Sufism] [Secure book orders]
